From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D6CD29FFE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-02.galae.net (smtpout-02.galae.net [185.246.84.56]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc02-g2.8921.1768394056715930125 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 04:34:18 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="dkim: body hash did not verify" header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=dkim header.b=lfDmJgxn; spf=pass (domain: bootlin.com, ip: 185.246.84.56, mailfrom: joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-02.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E7F81A284A; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6823C6074A; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id DD0B910B681EE; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:34:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1768394053; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=ETGLxwbYpaYExBCWjc4nWmJYDZBa502BYnh2NjY2iso=; b=lfDmJgxn6G40Zi8KjZgzKq0k+cH/b9imApFR98oQqWHjWKMiezFw8wZmaNXse0To8NfG7W CPFdXrQSDRabnKYVe73+ewCg1wfULpf8h0PhvwR75JSu3+lVHRK3ICeQdo6MCtG/ZvqYiE 5bpLtVzSpMJA/PCrkssg/iQqyaiDujbaFp3VvVA+Ev3fTOzhCV+TbNCEK7ebSktU+tZgje D/oeBysDEx+9AoF4Qr7f/FZH87QWiX2F1m6Xc+cnuWelZx+uCWKGL0LHgkZdgVkdFjYGfB dQoAQCqUfixBUu7D1QY1LCrxAiPwtad8q2deUGQPVJH/RcH+Z1KgWRtoYn0uPg== Message-ID: <0b148d6c-561a-4fc1-b42c-fc645fd4e526@bootlin.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:34:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/2] Move RISC-V recipe-specific configuration out of common includes To: Richard Purdie , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Cc: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Khem Raj , Bruce Ashfield References: <20260107151436.964819-1-joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com> <05138af86479c4310bb28a8a4077c80a5607b0a9.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Language: en-US, fr From: Joao Marcos Costa Organization: Bootlin In-Reply-To: <05138af86479c4310bb28a8a4077c80a5607b0a9.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:34:24 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229322 Hello, On 1/14/26 13:30, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 11:01 +0100, Joao Marcos Costa via lists.openembe= dded.org wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Gentle ping! >> >> On 1/7/26 16:14, Jo=C3=A3o Marcos Costa wrote: >>> This series moves RISC-V specific configuration out of linux- >>> yocto.inc into a >>> new inc file: linux-yocto-features.inc. >>> >>> By relocating these RISC-V specific settings, the configuration >>> remains >>> available for oe-core builds while avoiding unintended side effects >>> for external >>> or custom recipes that require such include file. >>> >>> The first patch only changes u-boot, and u-boot contains only one >>> versioned >>> recipe, so I kept it as it was in v1. >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> - As per the comments in v1, I created a new inc file that is now >>> included in >>> =C2=A0=C2=A0 the versioned recipes >>> >> >> Would you have any thoughts on this v2? Thanks. >=20 > See the weekly status reports. We are having huge problems merging > patches at the moment due to failures in our testing infrastructure. Yes, I just read them. > Patches which fix some of those issues get priority, most other things > are delayed, sorry. Time we might have spent on patch review is also > needed elsewhere right now. >=20 > I wish I had something better to report :/. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Richard I completely understand, no worries. Thanks for the reply. --=20 Best regards, Jo=C3=A3o Marcos Costa