Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	"Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: auh@auh.yoctoproject.org,
	OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.05 FAILED
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 16:04:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0df38331-afdf-b47c-410e-6640c74e8b14@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c49ac0d-e52e-505b-d6c2-688ca7b3fb6e@gmail.com>

On 05/17/2018 01:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Looks like AUH runs as a x86 machine, which is why it doesn't catch
>>> u-boot.
>>
>> Also we have already discussed this 2 month ago. Marek, as the u-boot
>> maintainer, can you look into enabling u-boot on qemu please?
> 
> Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the AUH so it handles U-Boot and
> similar packages correctly even without the qemu dependency ?

Determining the latest upstream version, performing the recipe upgrade, 
and testing that the upgraded version builds are all done by calling 
bitbake. Which of course requires that MACHINE is set to something 
specific, in this case qemux86. As u-boot is disabled there, it gets 
skipped. I could special-case u-boot, but I do think it's better to 
enable it on qemu, which would also allow better AB testing across 
architectures and during runtime (booting images) for instance.

Alex




  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-17 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180517021314.0C556440002@auh.yoctoproject.org>
2018-05-17  9:40 ` [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.05 FAILED Marek Vasut
2018-05-17  9:56   ` Burton, Ross
2018-05-17  9:53     ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-05-17 10:33       ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-17 12:17         ` Burton, Ross
2018-05-17 13:04         ` Alexander Kanavin [this message]
2018-05-17 21:20           ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-18 14:06             ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-05-17 14:01         ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0df38331-afdf-b47c-410e-6640c74e8b14@linux.intel.com \
    --to=alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=auh@auh.yoctoproject.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox