From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFA1786B2 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:35:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Jan 2018 04:35:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,348,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="9229648" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2018 04:35:27 -0800 To: Martin Kelly , Jussi Pakkanen References: <2ce0ac68-4ef4-41f5-c931-81990ecd1d03@xevo.com> <0ca64688-6a1d-0415-537f-bf59fb8dd2a6@xevo.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <0f020bf5-d0e7-82ae-c2b3-e7ea5006313d@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:35:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Paul Eggleton , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Issues with meson in SDK with cross-file X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:35:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/11/2018 09:22 PM, Martin Kelly wrote: > Khem and Alexander, could you comment on which solution is preferable > from an SDK standpoint? Otherwise, could you nominate someone else to do > so in your place? :) I'm not sure who is the resident SDK expert, perhaps Paul Eggleton? Alex