Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>, Zhenfeng.Zhao@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ruby: Add ruby 1.9.3 recipe
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:24:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10317249.W4Cacltz0J@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7D3BA9A-464D-4DC2-BD70-84D2D10FBF16@dominion.thruhere.net>

On Thursday 28 June 2012 18:02:47 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 28 jun. 2012, om 11:47 heeft <jackie.huang@windriver.com> 
<jackie.huang@windriver.com> het volgende geschreven:
> > From: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
> > 
> > Took ruby 1.8.7 from OE and updated to 1.9.3-p194.
> > Most of the 1.9.3 patches originate from ruby-1.9.3.194-10.1.fc17.src.rpm
> 
> Is ruby something that belongs into oe-core?

I was thinking the same thing - it's not something that everyone needs, so 
really it doesn't belong there IMHO.

Where it should go is another question. If we would expect to add lots of 
supplementary ruby recipes in future then perhaps its own layer would be 
appropriate; otherwise I guess it can go into meta-oe.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-28 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-28  9:47 [PATCH 1/2] ruby: Add yaml for ruby jackie.huang
2012-06-28  9:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] ruby: Add ruby 1.9.3 recipe jackie.huang
2012-06-28 16:02   ` Koen Kooi
2012-06-28 16:24     ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2012-06-28 17:08       ` Saul Wold
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-28  8:14 [PATCH 1/2] ruby: Add yaml for ruby jackie.huang
2012-06-28  8:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] ruby: Add ruby 1.9.3 recipe jackie.huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10317249.W4Cacltz0J@helios \
    --to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Zhenfeng.Zhao@windriver.com \
    --cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox