From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCyAl-0000Jv-H6 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:04:43 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2012 11:55:40 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="122773140" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.243]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2012 11:55:39 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:55:37 +0100 Message-ID: <10509160.Vt3KZmcQrf@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.0.0-16-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <12232640.MdqDDZk2lY@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: adding a single package to an image -- what's the proper way? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:04:43 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 28 March 2012 15:19:20 Andrea Adami wrote: > Robert, core-image-base is much better for testing (is a bit like > Angstrom console-image) > > Paul, > maybe core-image-base (and core-image-core) should be listed in the > output of oe-init-build-env & co.? Possibly. In the next development cycle though I would like to do a rework of the images and tasks so that they are better named and particularly in the case of tasks, more effective. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre