From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UboTp-0002e7-0Z for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 10:51:38 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 May 2013 01:33:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,660,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="336157526" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.12.245]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 May 2013 01:33:25 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:33:25 +0100 Message-ID: <11599561.3zUhJSzPUZ@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.8.0-19-generic; KDE/4.10.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <51909DB8.3060407@linux.intel.com> References: <1368189198-1294-1-git-send-email-jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com> <3529451.hQA8zCVn47@helios> <51909DB8.3060407@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Enable VPN support in ConnMan X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 08:51:46 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 08:51:46 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 13 May 2013 11:00:56 Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/12/2013 10:55 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Sunday 12 May 2013 19:54:50 Phil Blundell wrote: > >> On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 08:40 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > >>> On 05/12/2013 06:27 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >>>> I think so, it'd be good to have it in oe-core and allow use of vpn :) > >>> > >>> I would like to see what the full dependency set looks like for these, > >>> clearly there is the vpnc, openvpn, l2tp and pptp recipes, but what else > >>> and what licenses are they under. > >> > >> I don't think we necessarily want openvpn, l2tpd and suchlike in > >> oe-core. None of those things seem very "core" to me (in an embedded > >> context) and testing them seems like it would be a bit of a challenge. > > > > I agree, these don't belong in OE-Core. We already have them in meta- > > networking. > > This is what I get for replying to an email while traveling overseas and > not being 100% clear about my points. > > I was more interested in the dependencies then actually thinking about > including them in OE-Core,that was not my intent. > > This would would allow us to better understand if those recipes not in > meta-networking could be moved from meta-oe to meta-networking. > Currently, I think vpnc and pptp are in meta-networking, not the other 2. They are all in meta-networking (xl2tpd, pptp-linux and vpnc have always been there, openvpn got moved in mid-April). Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre