From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Px225-0008GQ-EZ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:53:21 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p28Ipd1B023221; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:51:39 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22665-10; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:51:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p28IpROX023215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:51:30 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: <1299135167-18330-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1299135167-18330-3-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:51:24 -0800 Message-ID: <1299610284.602.99.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: "saul.wold" Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] distro_tracking_fields.inc: Use 2.6.37.2 instead of 2.6.36 for linux-libc-headers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:53:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:39 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > --- > > .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc | 6 +++--- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc > > index 1dab90a..beb18e2 100644 > > --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc > > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc > > @@ -2884,9 +2884,9 @@ RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-libtool = "Nov 8, 2010" > > RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-libtool = "Nitin A Kamble " > > > > RECIPE_STATUS_pn-linux-libc-headers="green" > > -RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-linux-libc-headers="2.6.36" > > -RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Nov 8, 2010" > > -RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Nitin A Kamble " > > +RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-linux-libc-headers="2.6.37.2" > > +RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Mar 1, 2011" > > +RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Khem Raj " > > > > RECIPE_STATUS_pn-lsof="green" > > RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-lsof="4.84" > > -- > > 1.7.4.1 With this patch, I need to work out who "owns" these tracking fields going forwards and what the policy is regarding them. I'd like some input from Saul on this although it might not happen until next week as we're both travelling. Cheers, Richard