From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2N9N-0000AI-40 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:26:57 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2NCP6DA028084 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:25:06 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26487-08 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:25:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2NCP17Q028064 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:25:01 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <6CA3B184-AD05-4A9B-90CE-25AE38DECA39@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <6CA3B184-AD05-4A9B-90CE-25AE38DECA39@dominion.thruhere.net> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:24:59 +0000 Message-ID: <1300883099.3018.2.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:26:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 12:49 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > I'd like to import the EFL recipes Martin did from meta-shr into the meta-openembedded repo. Before I go bothering Martin about it, what would be the best place to put them? > > Inside meta-oe: > > meta-openembedded/ > meta-oe/ > recipes-efl > > or next to it? > > meta-openembedded/ > meta-oe/ > meta-efl/ I think the latter might be better in this case. A lot depends on who is going to maintain them and what the maintainer model is going to be. I think keeping things we can logically separate from meta-oe separate is a good thing though in general. We need people to start thinking more in terms of layers. Cheers, Richard