From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2QYT-00031C-2N for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:05:22 +0100 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2011 09:03:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,231,1299484800"; d="scan'208";a="407264296" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.16.108]) ([10.255.16.108]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2011 09:03:10 -0700 From: Joshua Lock To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <20110323154018.GI2224@xora-desktop.xora.org.uk> References: <6CA3B184-AD05-4A9B-90CE-25AE38DECA39@dominion.thruhere.net> <20110323154018.GI2224@xora-desktop.xora.org.uk> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:03:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1300896184.3488.17.camel@scimitar> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) Subject: Re: [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:05:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 15:40 +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:19:31AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd like to import the EFL recipes Martin did from meta-shr into the meta-openembedded repo. Before I go bothering Martin about it, what would be the best place to put them? > > > > > > Inside meta-oe: > > > > > > meta-openembedded/ > > > meta-oe/ > > > recipes-efl > > > > Can efl we layered directly on top of oe-core ? i.e. without needing meta-oe > > in that case its better to be an independent layer. otherwise I would say put > > them under recipes-efl > > > That is certainly not how I see layers being built up. I am expecting > in future us to have things like. > > meta-gnome > meta-kde > meta-efl > meta-lxde > meta-xorg Me too, in fact I think this image from the Yocto Project website succinctly portrays the goal: http://www.yoctoproject.org/sites/default/files/yocto-layers_1.png Possibly less the meta-yocto but you get the point. Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Build System Monkey Intel Open Source Technology Centre