From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QE7Uv-0000dX-Eu for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:09:45 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3OM79kA001436; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:07:09 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01370-02; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:07:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3OM6pKH001392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:06:52 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:45:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1303681519.5518.373.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Koen Kooi , Kang Kai Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/37] gconf-dbus: add SRCREV to recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:09:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 23:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Martin Jansa > > * taken from meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc for > those who want gconf-dbus and are not using poky > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa I've like to hold off this SRCREV change and the other one for just a little longer. Yu Ke is doing some investigation to confirm that global include file is no longer required and assuming we find it isn't, we'll move everything to the recipes in one go. I'd rather not do this piecemeal and risk confusion so I'd appreciate patience for another few days on this one. Cheers, Richard