From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QHNYo-0008CK-OI; Tue, 03 May 2011 23:55:14 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p43Lqckx022314; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:52:38 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22106-03; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:52:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p43LqVxJ022308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 May 2011 22:52:32 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-members@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <4DC05B11.6070506@balister.org> <1304454137.21461.135.camel@rex> Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 22:52:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1304459549.21461.142.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core Subject: Re: OpenEmbedded eV membership drive X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 21:55:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 23:15 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/5/3 Richard Purdie > This was discussed at the last TSC meeting and we reviewed the > TSC > meeting minutes where it was recorded that: > > """ > Election wise, we'll elect the seats in the order from the > board > announcement email until we have 5 elected members. We will > rely on the > board to call the first election in May. > """ > > which the TSC has reminded the board about last week. > > I don't think it is up to the TSC to decide on the re-election > timeframe. As it stands the TSC got a 2 month mandate. See the quote > above (from Philip's email from feb 10). > That is all I wanted to indicate. The TSC was asked by the board to figure out the details of the election which we did in the first meeting as requested and provided our feedback back to the board. The board naturally has the ultimate say in this. Cheers, Richard