From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QK76b-0007oN-Ih for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:57:25 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4BAscOj018194 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:54:38 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18130-01 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:54:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4BAsT1Q018188 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:54:33 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: <4B81AF14-3B09-4B77-884C-AAF3BE237FA9@dominion.thruhere.net> <1305107117.30391.325.camel@rex> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:54:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1305111264.30391.338.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] RFC Distro config changes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:57:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:45 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > For the uclibc bits, I'm proposing > > to add: > > > > +DEPLOY_DIR_append = "-uclibc" > > +STAGING_DIR_TARGET_append = "-uclibc" > > +STAGING_DIR_HOST_append = "-uclibc" > > +SSTATE_MANIFESTS_append = "-uclibc" > > > > to tclibc-uclibc.inc. > > Can we use _append_libc-uclibc = "uclibc" or even plain ${TCLIBC} in a > generic include file? That would be a lot more readable and fix glibc > vs eglibc. Changing uclibc around is ok as its not something that has worked well in with OE-Core for a while. What I'm trying to avoid is having to bump all the versions of the sstate files, the sysroot layout and associated version numbers which is what would have to happen if we change the eglibc layout :(. Obviously, if angstrom switches layout its pain for you though so I suspect someone loses with this either way :/. > > For the SDK/TOOLCHAIN bits, I need to have a close look at the SDK and > > figure out what the implications are there as I want to ensure that they > > can all be parallel installed as well as being in separate tarballs but > > its something we need to look at. > > I needed 'armv5te' and 'armv7a' in the tarball name, so that's how > this is derived. It matched the OE names, but Khem found some bugs and > changed it a little. Makes sense and I see the need, I just want to ensure the tarballs we have can be parallel installed. Cheers, Richard