From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QLwDZ-00065C-Gu for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 13:44:09 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4GBfIql019006 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:41:18 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18804-04 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:41:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4GBfA8B019000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:41:11 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: <13617913-C458-40F1-AA46-489ACEADF340@dominion.thruhere.net> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:41:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1305546068.3424.33.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tclibc-uclibc.inc: Append -uclibc only to target recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:44:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 02:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > Op 16 mei 2011, om 08:04 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > > > >> Do not define DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE > >> Append -uclibc to STAGING_DIR_TARGET only for target recipe and cross > >> recipes > >> Append -uclibc to STAGING_DIR_HOST only for target recipes. > >> > >> These changes make sure that we still share the native sysroot > > > > I still stay we append tclibc unconditionally. > > yes thats would simplify things if we agree to use TCLIBC in bitbake.conf We can't depend on TCLIBC in bitbake.conf since someone still has the option of not using the standard configuration boilerplate we're providing. Cheers, Richard