From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QM1F0-00041M-Fu for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:05:58 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QM0Bb-000456-Ri for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:58:23 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:24:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1305563063.2429.65.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: LIC_FILES_CHKSUM fatal? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:05:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This change, from commit d2d5456cd3b3bd3e52a5dedccca4d46e3a7986d1: diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass index 225530a..71ed5b6 100644 --- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ def package_qa_check_license(workdir, d): # just throw a warning now. Once licensing data in entered for enough of the recipes, # this will be converted into error and False will be returned. bb.error(pn + ": Recipe file does not have license file information (LIC_FILES_CHKSUM)") - return True + return False means that, contrary to what the comment says, lack of LIC_FILES_CHKSUM is now a fatal error. Was this a deliberate change or an oversight? p.