From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237]
	helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>)
	id 1QM3rx-000175-VL for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Mon, 16 May 2011 21:54:22 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4GJpR07022934;
	Mon, 16 May 2011 20:51:27 +0100
Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with LMTP
	id 22901-01; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:51:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4GJpLFP022928
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 16 May 2011 20:51:21 +0100
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=0TcHgXmYpwCjX6P5h6+y9O2YQFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1305418871.git.sgw@linux.intel.com>
	<E943FF3D-A282-4E6D-8B5A-B954A678A0E1@gmail.com>
	<4DD13B6F.4010009@intel.com>
	<BANLkTi=0TcHgXmYpwCjX6P5h6+y9O2YQFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:51:19 +0100
Message-ID: <1305575479.3424.102.camel@rex>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net
Cc: Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Move Old Recipes to meta-extras
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:54:22 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:08 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com> wrote:
> > On 05/15/2011 11:19 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On May 14, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Saul Wold<sgw@linux.intel.com>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Saul Wold<sgw@linux.intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> This proposes to move the YAFFS2-utils, older clutter-1.4
> >>> and older GCC version (4.3.3 and 3.4.4) as they are unused
> >>> and currently unbuildable.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Are we left with any GPLv2 version of gcc after this ?
> >>
> > Khem,
> >
> > Is not having a GPLv2 version of gcc an issue? For the non-gplv3 version, my
> > understanding is to have an installed user-space for oe-core for a
> > non-development system, therefore gcc is not an issue.
> >
> 
> there are certain parts of gcc which go onto target e.g. libgcc libstdc++

These have specific license exceptions allowing non-gpl code to use them
as system libraries though?

Cheers,

Richard