Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: sstate breakage with multimachine
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:13:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305587619.3424.134.camel@rex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46AB3A39-160F-4EB9-B92E-8DE957C1284D@dominion.thruhere.net>

On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> This bug gets reintroduced every other week, so let's try to fix it
> properly this time. The situation:
> 
> 2 machines (beagleboard, pandaboard) using the same base architecture
> (armv7a).
> 
> step 0: rm build pseudone -rf
> step 1: MACHINE=beagleboard bitbake console-image
> step 2: MACHINE=omap4430-panda bitbake console-image
> 
> Step 0 and 1 work great, but I can't get step 2 to work. Attached is
> the complete output of step 2. As you can see without any updates to
> the repositories it wants to rebuild (e)glibc.
> 
> Why does it wants to rebuild all that? Why does it fail?

I had a look at this. Firstly, I figured out I needed an incantation to
reproduce which turned out to be:

git clone git://git.angstrom-distribution.org/setup-scripts
git checkout oe-core
MACHINE=beagleboard ./oebb.sh config beagleboard
MACHINE=beagleboard ./oebb.sh bitbake console-image -S
MACHINE=omap4430-panda ./oebb.sh bitbake console-image -S

I added the -S option to dump sigdata files into the stamp directory so
I didn't need to run two builds before being able to look at this. Sure
enough, if you look
at /media/build2/builds/angstrom/setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x/stamps/all-angstrom-linux-gnueabi
update-rc.d* then the do_populate_lic task is duplicated as are the
do_package and its subsequent tasks.

Diffing the do_populate_lic task, it shows DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE has a
dependency on the MACHINE variable so its correctly rerunning the task
for that reason. This is an Angstrom specific change and adding: 

 DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE = "${DEPLOY_DIR}/images/${MACHINE}"
+DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE[vardepsexclude] = "MACHINE"
 
to conf/distro/include/angstrom.inc makes it go away. I'm not claiming
its the correct fix, it just proves where the problem is.

Secondly, the do_package task was depending on eglibc do_package. This
is almost certainly due to the default dependencies on things like
virtual/libc which we add. Being an "all" PACKAGE_ARCH, it clearly
doesn't depend on this so adding INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1" to the
update-rc.d recipe removed that problem and meant packaging didn't
rerun.

Further investigation is needed and these fixes need some thought and
creation of proper patches but hopefully this gives a handle on whats
going on and it turns out its not that hard to figure out (although some
scripts to compare two such runs would be interesting and/or some proper
test cases).

Note that the DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE[vardepsexclude] is not correct. The
do_populate_lic task is putting files into the directory and the system
is therefore totally correct in deciding that the task needed to rerun
as the files were being placed in a different directory. do_populate_lic
could likely use some work in that regard as I'm not sure this is the
right place to be putting its data though.

Cheers,

Richard




  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-16 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-16 11:20 sstate breakage with multimachine Koen Kooi
2011-05-16 23:13 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2011-05-17  6:34   ` Koen Kooi
2011-05-17  9:37     ` Richard Purdie
2011-05-17  7:14 ` Martin Jansa
2011-05-17  9:42   ` Richard Purdie
2011-05-17 11:37     ` Martin Jansa
2011-05-17 23:10       ` Richard Purdie
2011-05-18  4:26         ` Martin Jansa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1305587619.3424.134.camel@rex \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox