From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QMH5Q-0007tt-W4 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:01:09 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMH2g-0004Vu-02 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:58:18 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <1305588971.3424.142.camel@rex> References: <3f105b122736772aa2cf11d4b346d764239b2a68.1305580484.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> <1305588971.3424.142.camel@rex> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:58:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1305626296.2429.179.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] xserver-kdrive: upgrade from 1.7.99.2 to 1.10.1 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:01:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 00:36 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > As far as I can tell, we can throw away xtscal, libxcalibrate, and > calibrateproto after that change since they need that X extension. Its a > good example of why changes need to get upstream as if the build fix was > there, they'd have had less reason to remove it. It is a bit of a shame that XCALIBRATE has been removed upstream, but it's fairly self-contained and it wouldn't be all that hard for oe[-core] to patch it back in again. > We probably are going to need to rewrite xtscal to use XI2 at this > point :/. Yes, or that might be a better answer in the long term. I do have a certain fondness for XCALIBRATE but it was never an especially elegant solution to the problem. If XI2 can do the same thing more neatly then updating xtscal to use it is probably the right thing. Patches welcome I guess :-} p.