From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QMbg9-00009a-SA for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 10:00:26 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4I7vU0G025840; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:57:30 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25490-07; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:57:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4I7vLXK025834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 May 2011 08:57:21 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: <20110518074909.GA31650@sakrah.homelinux.org> References: <1305591231.3424.152.camel@rex> <20110518074909.GA31650@sakrah.homelinux.org> Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 08:57:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1305705436.3424.299.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tclibc-uclibc.inc: Append -uclibc only to target recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 08:00:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:49 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > I think we need to globalize libc variable like MACHINE or MULTIMACHINE > and we could check if PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libc == TCLIBC or not > in base.bbclass for sanity. Something like attached patch might be > able to do it Having assessed how many places in the system we'd need to make this kind of change I'm now of the opinion its too great. I think manipulating TMPDIR is a better cleaner solution and we should inject this there... Cheers, Richard