From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QMgsJ-0001E3-Kj for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:33:19 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4IDUPsg028372; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:30:25 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27964-08; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:30:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4IDUGie028356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 May 2011 14:30:16 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:30:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1305725413.3424.316.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Robert Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] 18-May-2011 Consolidated Pull X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 13:33:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 01:17 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > This requests includes the removal of clutter, yaffs and older > gcc version, along with the GCC 4.6 Update for x86 and arm. > > There is the start of the meta-skeleton layer, which I believe > we want to be part of oe-core for solid examples to developers. > > As of this writing there is a problem with perl which I think a > change to the utils.bbclass might fix (adding readlink -fn $0), but > I am still testing this. I merged this with the exception of the change to gcc 4.6 by default. I'm a little hesitant to make that switch until a few more people have tried using it (e.g. I noticed Bruce was having problems yesterday). Cheers, Richard