From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237]
	helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>)
	id 1QMrUt-0006P4-9V for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Thu, 19 May 2011 02:53:51 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4J0ovAa001492
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Thu, 19 May 2011 01:50:57 +0100
Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with LMTP
	id 00907-10 for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Thu, 19 May 2011 01:50:49 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4J0okBv001478
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Thu, 19 May 2011 01:50:47 +0100
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
In-Reply-To: <CF837081-FAD3-4922-975B-B3CB6DD60533@dominion.thruhere.net>
References: <cover.1305665459.git.raj.khem@gmail.com>
	<cc2e6337ae338737455bf63bd43278dee302fb5c.1305665459.git.raj.khem@gmail.com>
	<1305734038.18415.108.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com>
	<BANLkTikiNW0UEfLM_UtKeekTcrW5UNNfUA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1305738527.18415.126.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com>
	<8A91C5F6-313A-4A0F-A18E-094CFC3BB337@dominion.thruhere.net>
	<BANLkTinvqEeyXsiH79UHb3Zhx+qkXZRJ5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinwdO5XBGH=py2iw0kyJt6o77q7rw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CF837081-FAD3-4922-975B-B3CB6DD60533@dominion.thruhere.net>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 01:47:28 +0100
Message-ID: <1305766048.3424.385.camel@rex>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] default-distrovars.inc, task-core-boot.bb: Create distro overridable varibales
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 00:53:51 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 20:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 18 mei 2011, om 20:07 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
> > there are certain common parts that can be abstracted
> > and can be maintained in oe-core so everyone benefits
> > from it and certain image specific parts can be done in
> > distros. So keeping common parts in core would still
> > be better IMO
> 
> And in OE .dev we split task-boot from task-base to be able to get the
> benefits from task base without forcing task-boot. OE-core had the
> same till it got forcefully added to the extra depends last week.

Which was a genuine mistake and I need to merge the patch that is around
to address that particular issue.

Cheers,

Richard