From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QN1YU-0005YL-ER for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:38:14 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4JBZF6a007453 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:35:15 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07401-01 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:35:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4JBZ95a007447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:35:10 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:35:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1305804906.3424.480.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:38:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:01 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > What should I do to either disable this for some recipes, or use a > different (private) server? > We do not wish to rely on an external server for proprietary recipes (or for > recipes for which we made a local change in an overlay). > How is this case handled? This could be handled by doing things like setting: PRSERV_HOST_pn-myprivaterecipe = "somelocalhost" or PRSERV_HOST_pn-myprivaterecipe = "" to disable it. One thing we lack is a good way to apply changes like this, only if code is within a given layer. Even in that case, it should be possible with anonymous python to look at the location of the current .bb file and then conditionally set these variables as appropriate to the right server. Certainly this needs to be thought about and documented but I think there are ways to do it. Cheers, Richard