From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QOTtj-0007m3-8x for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:06:11 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QOTqr-0001fQ-BW for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:03:13 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <25cb5d89f245bcfdc7f0654ba7025e1e1a24bc64.1306002889.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> References: <25cb5d89f245bcfdc7f0654ba7025e1e1a24bc64.1306002889.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:03:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1306152192.2525.73.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] puzzles: update to r9173 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 12:06:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 11:37 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold > --- > .../puzzles/{puzzles_r9163.bb => puzzles_r9173.bb} | 0 > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > rename meta/recipes-sato/puzzles/{puzzles_r9163.bb => puzzles_r9173.bb} (100%) No doubt the patch is fine, but why is this recipe in oe-core at all? It doesn't seem to fit any reasonable definition of "core" functionality that I can immediately think of. p.