From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QOt32-0004f8-35 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:57:28 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QOt08-0002Rq-So; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:54:29 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: <4DDBC45A.6090102@intel.com> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 15:54:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1306248867.2525.198.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Cc: Saul Wold Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] eglibc.inc: Transfer PARALLEL_MAKE to PARALLELMFLAGS X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:57:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 07:52 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > I have done couple of builds of eglibc with -j 2 Do you really mean that? I wonder if you actually tested with -j2 instead. p.