From: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] conf/bitbake.conf: Added variables for PR service.
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 13:47:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306414026.2525.337.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F232DBFB10B@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 20:43 +0800, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> The problem is that in OE-core the default -deb/-dbg packages are all
> using EXTENDPV, as well as some other recipes. Do you mean we should
> make them all using EXTENDPKGV instead of EXTENDPV?
As far as I can tell, yes, that would be the right thing to do. That's
what I was thinking of when I mentioned the "couple of uses" before.
The only reason I hesitate is that, although the current behaviour looks
like it should be wrong, nobody has actually complained about it and
that makes me wonder if I have misunderstood something.
I guess someone needs to do a few tests to figure out what exactly is
going on there. But I am fairly sure that creating a hybrid PV+PKGR is
not a good thing to do; it should be either one thing or the other, and
as far as I know everything on the output side should be using PKGxx.
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-26 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-26 11:55 [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service(revised) Lianhao Lu
2011-05-26 11:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] Added the PR service Lianhao Lu
2011-05-26 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] conf/bitbake.conf: Added variables for " Lianhao Lu
2011-05-26 11:59 ` Phil Blundell
2011-05-26 12:43 ` Lu, Lianhao
2011-05-26 12:47 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2011-05-26 13:02 ` Lu, Lianhao
2011-05-26 13:07 ` Phil Blundell
2011-05-26 14:08 ` Richard Purdie
2011-05-26 11:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] classes/package(prserv).bbclass: Added PR service support Lianhao Lu
2011-05-26 11:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] classes/package_xxx.class: " Lianhao Lu
2011-05-26 11:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] meta-yocto/local.conf.sample: Added PRSERV_HOST and PRSERV_PORT Lianhao Lu
2011-05-26 12:07 ` [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service(revised) Koen Kooi
2011-05-26 12:29 ` Lu, Lianhao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-19 10:29 [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service Lianhao Lu
2011-05-19 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] conf/bitbake.conf: Added variables for " Lianhao Lu
2011-05-19 11:51 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306414026.2525.337.camel@phil-desktop \
--to=pb@pbcl.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox