Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: "all" architecture packages
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:15:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306844141.27470.360.camel@rex> (raw)

Hi,

There have been various comments on the list and in the bugzilla about
issues with "all" architecture recipes.

To start cleaning this up I've merged:

http://git.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core/commit/?id=26e5e5feb695864b11e47e24017e254c28f14494

which creates an "allarch" class and starts to convert some recipes over
to using it. There is further information in the commit message. Use of
the class ensures the packages really are suitable for all architectures
and that the sstate packages are reusable.

The list of packages which still need attention are:

meta/recipes-connectivity/resolvconf/resolvconf_1.48.bb                 
meta/recipes-devtools/update-alternatives/update-alternatives-dpkg.inc  
meta/recipes-gnome/gnome/gnome-common_2.28.0.bb                         
meta/recipes-gnome/gnome/gnome-icon-theme_2.31.0.bb                     
meta/recipes-gnome/hicolor-icon-theme/hicolor-icon-theme_0.12.bb        
meta/recipes-graphics/ttf-fonts/liberation-fonts_1.04.bb                
meta/recipes-graphics/ttf-fonts/liberation-fonts_1.06.bb                
meta/recipes-graphics/ttf-fonts/ttf-bitstream-vera_1.10.bb              
meta/recipes-graphics/xcursor-transparent-theme/xcursor-transparent-theme_0.1.1.bb
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-font/encodings_1.0.4.bb                      
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-font/font-alias_1.0.3.bb                     
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-font/font-util_1.2.0.bb                      
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-font/xorg-font-common.inc                    
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-font/xorg-minimal-fonts.bb                   
meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb                
meta/recipes-sato/sato-icon-theme/sato-icon-theme.inc                   
meta/recipes-sato/sato-icon-theme/sato-icon-theme_0.4.1.bb              
meta/recipes-support/hal/hal-info.inc                                   

Some of these are easy, some trigger configure tests for the cross
compiler and are harder to fix.

If a package can't use allarch.bbclass, its a strong indicator it
shouldn't be PACKAGE_ARCH = "all"...

Cheers,

Richard





             reply	other threads:[~2011-05-31 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-31 12:15 Richard Purdie [this message]
2011-05-31 12:26 ` "all" architecture packages Koen Kooi
2011-05-31 12:55   ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306844141.27470.360.camel@rex \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox