From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRliM-0007sI-R4 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:44:02 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRlfK-0001fr-II for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:40:54 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <806387a97c6c01bb724c29f51de511ed43688bb0.1306931848.git.dexuan.cui@intel.com> References: <806387a97c6c01bb724c29f51de511ed43688bb0.1306931848.git.dexuan.cui@intel.com> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:40:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1306935653.2529.88.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 01/16] native.bbclass: allow a native package to be populated into its own dir X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:44:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 21:18 +0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: > +PACKAGE_OWN_DIR = "" > +bindir .= "${PACKAGE_OWN_DIR}" > +libdir .= "${PACKAGE_OWN_DIR}" > +libexecdir .= "${PACKAGE_OWN_DIR}" I think the general idea of this patch is a good one but I'm not terribly fond of the name of that variable. If this is meant to be a path suffix that you can optionally set for native packages then how about calling it something like NATIVE_PACKAGE_PATH_SUFFIX? p.