From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRnuC-00029K-1w for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:04:25 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRnr9-0001i6-Lf for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:01:15 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:01:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1306944074.2529.107.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: dbus-native --with-x X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:04:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is there any compelling reason why dbus-native needs to be built --with-x? This seems to be causing quite a large stack of native X11 packages to get built with, as far as I can tell, no useful result. dbus-native itself is pulled in by way of insane.bbclass -> desktop-file-utils-native -> glib-2.0-native, which I guess is reasonable. Though, as a future project, it might be nice to try to curtail the dependency on d-f-u-native if there aren't actually any .desktop files being shipped. p.