From: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: dbus-native --with-x
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:40:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306946450.2529.136.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CE41A629-FFAA-4A2D-9173-3BCF44CA932C@dominion.thruhere.net>
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:10 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 1 jun 2011, om 18:01 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
>
> > Is there any compelling reason why dbus-native needs to be built
> > --with-x? This seems to be causing quite a large stack of native X11
> > packages to get built with, as far as I can tell, no useful result.
>
> I agree, for -native --with-x is overkill
Actually, it turns out that dbus.inc already has:
EXTRA_OECONF_X = "--with-x"
EXTRA_OECONF_X_virtclass-native = "--without-x"
... it's just that it doesn't have any similar code to squash the
dependency on virtual/libx11 in the native case, so you end up building
the x libs anyway. Doh.
Knocking that dependency out has reduced the task count for
micro-base-image from 938 to 748, which seems like a worthwhile saving.
I'll send a patch later once I've verified that the image build does
actually succeed with that change.
p.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 16:01 dbus-native --with-x Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 16:03 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 16:11 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-01 16:16 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 16:48 ` Mark Hatle
2011-06-01 16:54 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 16:58 ` Mark Hatle
2011-06-01 17:08 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 18:55 ` rpmdeps, was " Mark Hatle
2011-06-01 19:00 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-01 21:14 ` Mark Hatle
2011-06-01 20:02 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 21:17 ` Mark Hatle
2011-06-02 9:18 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 20:22 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 22:00 ` Tom Rini
2011-06-01 22:07 ` Henning Heinold
2011-06-01 22:22 ` Tom Rini
2011-06-01 22:38 ` Mark Hatle
2011-06-02 9:08 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-02 17:04 ` Tom Rini
2011-06-02 19:21 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-02 19:29 ` Tom Rini
2011-06-02 7:12 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 16:10 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-01 16:40 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306946450.2529.136.camel@phil-desktop \
--to=pb@pbcl.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox