From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pb@pbcl.net>)
	id 1QRojK-00030h-N3 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:57:14 +0200
Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145])
	by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <pb@pbcl.net>) id 1QRogI-0001j4-8q
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:54:06 +0200
From: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
In-Reply-To: <4DE66D53.30505@windriver.com>
References: <1306944074.2529.107.camel@phil-desktop>
	<1306944235.2529.109.camel@phil-desktop>
	<5DBF32A5-22D5-4499-AD32-9C48680B7EBA@dominion.thruhere.net>
	<1306945014.2529.113.camel@phil-desktop> <4DE66D53.30505@windriver.com>
Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:54:05 +0100
Message-ID: <1306947245.2529.148.camel@phil-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 
Subject: Re: dbus-native --with-x
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:57:14 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 11:48 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> So in the above, perl and python are really the only items that could be disabled.

Just to be clear, in the list you mentioned, were you talking about the
usage of rpm-native for rpmdeps, or the usage by package_rpm.bbclass
itself?

If we can avoid building perl-native and python-native then that
certainly sounds like a win on its own, though :-)

p.