From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QS45Y-00084y-AI for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:21:13 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QS42U-00032L-BX; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:18:02 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Mark Hatle In-Reply-To: <4DE6AC56.7010308@windriver.com> References: <1306944074.2529.107.camel@phil-desktop> <1306944235.2529.109.camel@phil-desktop> <5DBF32A5-22D5-4499-AD32-9C48680B7EBA@dominion.thruhere.net> <1306945014.2529.113.camel@phil-desktop> <4DE66D53.30505@windriver.com> <1306947245.2529.148.camel@phil-desktop> <4DE66FC6.4030607@windriver.com> <1306948134.2529.158.camel@phil-desktop> <4DE68B24.8060503@windriver.com> <1306958566.3119.1.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <4DE6AC56.7010308@windriver.com> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:18:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1307006281.2529.169.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: rpmdeps, was Re: dbus-native --with-x X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:21:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 16:17 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > I'm not sure if the libraries that RPM uses would even be able to link w/o > openssl. (I never tried it.) But that will affect people who are using RPM > packages as signing and validation routines come from openssl. Sure, but if rpmdeps doesn't need those bits then we could have two recipes: a heavy one for those people who want rpm packages, and a lighter one for those who need rpmdeps to make package.bbclass work but don't otherwise have any requirement for rpm. p.