From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QSSx5-0006QE-EJ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:54:07 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p53BotLf004483 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:50:55 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04140-06 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:50:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p53Bojqm004477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:50:49 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <1307100750.2529.257.camel@phil-desktop> References: <1307100750.2529.257.camel@phil-desktop> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:50:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1307101823.5715.25.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] eglibc: enable eglibc configurability V2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:54:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:32 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 14:47 +0800, Kang Kai wrote: > > If want to disable locale-code charsets or locales, you have to uncomment > > PACKAGE_NO_GCONV = 1 > > Because without this, it fails on package_do_split_gconvs in libc-package.bbclass > > Can we not just fix libc-package.bbclass to stop it failing in that > situation? It seems a bit sad to require an extra "flip this switch to > make it work" kind of variable. That was my point in the earlier email :) Cheers, Richard