From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QSTrN-0007Pd-Dr for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:52:17 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSToI-0003bN-UY for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:49:07 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4DE83048.1030100@linux.intel.com> References: <21881aba9031cefb72fcc33cca9d146169f344e9.1307042670.git.otavio@ossystems.com.br> <4DE83048.1030100@linux.intel.com> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:49:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1307105343.2529.262.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xf86-driver-common.inc: remove .la files to avoid unpackaged warning X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:52:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 17:52 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 06/02/2011 12:25 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > +do_install_append () { > > + # driver's la files are not packaged > > + rm -f ${D}${libdir}/xorg/modules/drivers/*.la > > +} > > Would it not be better to package them in the -dev package instead of > throwing them away? Not really. The .la files for the drivers aren't good for anything: you aren't ever going to link against them. p.