From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QTybz-000311-T5 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:54:35 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QTyYl-0006vv-6B; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:51:15 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Saul Wold In-Reply-To: <4DEE44BF.1060308@linux.intel.com> References: <1307102133.2529.260.camel@phil-desktop> <4DEE44BF.1060308@linux.intel.com> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:51:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1307461872.2529.4771.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] uclibc: remove PACKAGE_ARCH, fix compilation on i586 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:54:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 08:33 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > This patch has not comments, Upstream-Status, or Sign-off-by. > > Please add these so we have some history to this patch and can determine > if it should be upstreamed. Is there some documentation which describes how Upstream-Status is meant to be set? Thanks p.