From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QU349-0002Hx-Lx for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:39:57 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p57KabLI023309 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:36:37 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23121-05 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:36:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p57KaViQ023302 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:36:31 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <1307439362.2529.4741.camel@phil-desktop> References: <1307102133.2529.260.camel@phil-desktop> <1307439362.2529.4741.camel@phil-desktop> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:36:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1307478987.15712.60.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] uclibc: remove PACKAGE_ARCH, fix compilation on i586 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:39:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 10:36 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > Ping? I'm not against this move at all but before this patch merges we should really have a cleanup which removes the *.machine configuration files from the uclibc recipe directory along with all the machine specific overrides that are in use instead making them arch specific. Any volunteers? Cheers, Richard > p. > > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:55 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > There is no good reason for uclibc to be machine specific. Remove local > > assignment to PACKAGE_ARCH so that it gets the default target > > architecture and bump PR for that change. > > > > See http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-May/003064.html > > > > Also replace a chunk of anonymous python with a COMPATIBLE_HOST > > declaration. > > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core