From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QUyIz-0006nq-9g for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:47:05 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUyFn-0000Ei-0o for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:43:47 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <1307697909.2529.4983.camel@phil-desktop> References: <79966738c56b3d8dbcb262642447f9efe7af930a.1307686610.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> <1307697909.2529.4983.camel@phil-desktop> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:43:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1307699021.2529.4986.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 4/4] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:47:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 10:25 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > This can't be right. I guess that would be a good thing for > recipe-sanity to test for in fact. ... except that this wouldn't have helped because oe-core doesn't currently have recipe_sanity at all. Heh. I'll send a patch for that later, and then maybe we can add the bogus DEPENDS checking as a future enhancement. p.