From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFnD-0002z8-Tl for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:39:36 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5DMaBJ5004765 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:36:11 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04419-08 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:36:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5DMa2Hl004759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:36:03 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4DF68AD4.1020403@mentor.com> References: <46ED2218-6735-449C-B10C-D557B92DA339@dominion.thruhere.net> <4DF672F2.2030909@linux.intel.com> <49501374-7FBE-400E-A91B-BD7EBD7FB65C@dominion.thruhere.net> <1308000620.15712.288.camel@rex> <4DF68AD4.1020403@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:35:43 +0100 Message-ID: <1308004543.15712.297.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: Where is atom-pc.conf hiding? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:39:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 15:10 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On 06/13/2011 02:30 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Op 13 jun 2011, om 22:28 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: > >> > >>> On 06/13/2011 11:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Khem was asking if I could reproduce the recent x86 breakage he was seeing[1] and I ran into another bug: > >>>> > >>>> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel$ git blame meta-n450/conf/machine/n450.conf | grep atom > >>>> 158f88d7 (Saul Wold 2011-01-03 15:33:52 -0800 6) require conf/machine/atom-pc.conf > >>>> > >>> meta-yocto seems to be the place you need to look! > >>> > >>> I hope that the layering tools can help to detect and inform folks of this like of dependency. > >> > >> Isn't meta-yocto supposed to a the integration layer with no new > >> parts? I can't use meta-yocto since it has conflicting beagleboard > >> stuff in it, which means that meta-intel is now broken for me as well. > >> That surely isn't the intended plan?!?! > > > > The plan on public record is that atom-pc moves to meta-intel as soon as > > the layer tooling comes online and meta-yocto becomes its own repo > > (which at present its not but its certainly the intent). > > Until then, and even afterwards can we please get some testing of > non-poky builds done? I know the autobuilder is full but can't we toss > a few things onto a personal box and try that a few times a week? Sure, the more people testing the various combinations the better! Cheers, Richard