From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QWVJG-0003rK-Gx for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:13:42 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWVFz-0004Jg-EK for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:10:19 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:10:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1308064218.25285.266.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Upgrade gcc 4.6.0 to latest on FSF 4.6 branch X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:13:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 21:03 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > This patch brings in new patches from gcc 4.6 FSF branch > And refreshes the headers of existing backported patches > to not have git patch numbers in comments > > I am not sending the patch itself to mailing list due to its > large size so please review it on the contrib tree itself This patch doesn't seem to have bumped PR on gcc-4.6.0.bb even though the SRC_URI has changed. Was that intentional? p.