From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QYd1J-0000fQ-VQ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:52:06 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5KBmLfC024069 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:48:21 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23634-06 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:48:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5KBmDoO024062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:48:14 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:48:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1308570480.10352.0.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: 'elfutils' needed to build kernel (perf), but not listed in DEPENDS X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:52:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 13:09 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > I finally tracked down the heisenbug that was causing kernel builds to fail: kernel*bbclass has no DEPENDS on elfutils, but it still tries to build perf. > > While grepping I also stumbled accross this gem: > > image-swab.bbclass:PARALLEL_MAKE_pn-elfutils = "" > > Parallel make fails only when using swabber? Correct, we're still trying to work out why this only happens with swabber and whether its a real PARALLEL_MAKE issue or some kind of bad interaction with make :( Cheers, Richard