From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QZPz1-0005D6-Ii for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:08:51 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZPva-0003KS-7u for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:05:19 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <1308758420.20015.82.camel@rex> References: <1308758420.20015.82.camel@rex> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:05:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1308758709.21613.104.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Change gcc 4.6 recipes to use svn in SRC_URI X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:08:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:00 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > I'm afraid I don't like having "gcc 4.6" being so publicly visible. Its > fine for the recipe names but the PV itself really needs to be something > like "4.6.2+svn". Well, er, gcc 4.6.1 hasn't even been released yet. I think "4.6.0 +svn" (or just "4.6+svn") is the only reasonable thing to put there. Calling it 4.6.2 would definitely be misleading. p.