Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Change gcc 4.6 recipes to use svn in SRC_URI

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 01:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> >
> > Op 22 jun 2011, om 18:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>> changes since V1
> >>>
> >>> Separate out non gcc changes to a different pull request
> >>> Patches are not attached inline due to sheer size of them
> >>> as they might choke patchwork. The are only on the branch
> >>>
> >>> The following changes since commit 78de64f58b98101f5be5778e9ecbdaae5ba32997:
> >>>
> >>>  binutils_2.21.bb: Fix ld segfault exposed by eglibc 2.14 on x86_64 (2011-06-21 17:58:06 -0700)
> >>>
> >>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>  git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib kraj/gcc-4.6
> >>>  http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/gcc-4.6
> >>>
> >>> Khem Raj (2):
> >>>  gcc-4.6: Switch to using svn SRC_URI for recipe
> >>>  tcmode-default.inc: use 4.6 for GCCVERSION and SDKGCCVERSION
> >>
> >> I'm afraid I don't like having "gcc 4.6" being so publicly visible. Its
> >> fine for the recipe names but the PV itself really needs to be something
> >> like "4.6.2+svn".
> >>
> >> I say this as a person who'd have to deal with people claiming we're
> >> behind on gcc since we were on 4.6[.0] :/
> >
> > There will always be people claiming nonsense about numbers :)
> 
> Hi Richard
> 
> I have pushed updated patches to the branch now. PV is set to 4.6.0+svnr${SRCPV}
> and we use wild card in choosing gcc version

Merged to master, thanks.

Richard