From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QbXbv-0004bv-02 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:41:47 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5SCc6OD022800 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:38:06 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22538-05 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:38:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5SCc0iO022794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:38:01 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4E09C426.1020904@intel.com> References: <7bf8a7025dddd0b251ff9c37a55f28b7e099fad7.1309246787.git.edwin.zhai@intel.com> <4E098D41.4060808@intel.com> <4E09C426.1020904@intel.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:37:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1309264667.20015.279.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] webkit-gtk: recommends glib-networking to access https web page X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:41:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:08 +0800, Zhai, Edwin wrote: > > Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > Op 28 jun 2011, om 10:13 heeft Zhai, Edwin het volgende geschreven: > > > > > > > > In future, other recipes besides webkit-gtk may ask for > > glib-networking, maybe we can change it that time? > > > What's your opinion? > > > > I'd either put it in the lib that uses it (soup) or the app that needs > > it (web-webkit), something in between is just confusing. > > > > Reasonable. I'd like to put it in libsoup. Actually, I think this sounds like a strong case to put it in web-webkit. My reasoning is that none of the other packages have the dependency, its really the use webkit makes of the libraries that is the requirement for the package... Cheers, Richard