From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbt7g-00012G-TC for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:40:00 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbt48-00015n-2P for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:36:21 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4E0A7159.4020003@gmail.com> References: <1309188248.21613.325.camel@phil-desktop> <4E0A7159.4020003@gmail.com> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:36:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1309347373.2551.26.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fontconfig: specify font directory in EXTRA_OECONF X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:40:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:27 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On 06/27/2011 08:24 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > -PR = "r1" > > +PR = "r3" > > a nitpick though not wrong but should be r2 Is it official policy that PRs need to be sequential? There seem to be various precedents for incrementing it by more than one in a single checkin, see for example d3fc33760a80b0a067b41ff88e99941f1c40c8f9 and 993a2367f881f1f4eaa10339cde93c7058660d67. If it's meant to only go up by one each time then I guess I can cope with that but it would require a bit of extra mangling at my end. p.