From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QbvRF-0005BT-G3 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:08:21 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5TE4b2s004853 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:04:37 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04529-09 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:04:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5TE4U50004847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:04:30 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <1309353632.2551.32.camel@phil-desktop> References: <1309353632.2551.32.camel@phil-desktop> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:04:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1309356253.20015.390.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] grub: add -fno-reorder-functions into STAGE2_COMPILE X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:08:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:20 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 21:09 +0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: > > +This turned out to be a gcc's bug. See > > +https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360513 > > +http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333 > > + > > +Upstream gcc seems uninterested in the bug, so at present we can disable the > > +option as a workaround. Thanks Ryan Hill for the investigation and the > > +workaround patch. > > I'm not sure it's fair to say that upstream gcc is uninterested. It > doesn't appear that anybody has been willing or able to produce a > testcase which will allow the gcc people to debug the problem. Agreed, it would be good if the gcc people could get a testcase to fix the problem. In the meantime I will take the workaround though. Cheers, RIchard