From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qc56F-0004MF-Ju for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:27:19 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2011 17:23:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,446,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="21710190" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.240]) ([10.255.13.240]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2011 17:23:35 -0700 From: Joshua Lock To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:23:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <000E4B57-AB90-4BF8-80B2-8698FEC51AA3@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <000E4B57-AB90-4BF8-80B2-8698FEC51AA3@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2 (3.0.2-2.fc15) Message-ID: <1309393415.24735.19.camel@scimitar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Sanity check network connectivity X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:27:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 00:00 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 29 jun 2011, om 23:55 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven: > > > v3 of this change set based on extra feedback from Khem Raj. > > Changes since v2: > > * Remove references to Yocto, don't offer default uri's to check > > Can't you offer an oe.org url to check instead? Can we? Sure. Should we? I don't know... If this is deemed desirable perhaps we'll need some small uri's to fetch from and test at least http, https and git fetches. Any suggestions? Could this be a follow on patch? Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Project "Johannes factotum" Intel Open Source Technology Centre