From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcaxf-0007Js-VB for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:28:36 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcau5-0002Bw-Oz for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:24:53 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <1309515335.20015.516.camel@rex> References: <1309513280.2633.28.camel@phil-desktop> <1309515335.20015.516.camel@rex> Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:24:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1309515892.2633.42.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Subject: Re: PRIORITY X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:28:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:15 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever > > reached a firm conclusion. > > > > Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any useful > > purpose in oe-core and can/should be removed from the recipes? > > I think that was the conclusion, yes. I'll take a patch (or a > commandline I guess). I did: $ find . -regex ".*\.\(bb\|inc\)$" | xargs sed -i '/^PRIORITY = ".*"$/d' which seemed to produce the desired results. I can send a patch if you like but it would be somewhat large and fairly uninteresting. p.