From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe6tW-0006tk-9d for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:46:34 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p65EgjeC032312 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:42:45 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32096-05 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:42:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p65EgaiL032306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:42:36 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: <1309271509.20015.310.camel@rex> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:42:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1309876925.20015.718.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: Heads Up: Bitbake minimum version change imminent X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:46:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 09:26 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > I just wanted to let people know that we have a minimum version of > > bitbake change imminent for OE-Core. > > > > I've already pushed the changes we need to bitbake for umask, shared > > work directory and multilib and updated its version to 1.13.2. I'm > > planning to merge patches to OE-Core which depend on these changes later > > this week (and bump the minimum version OE-Core requires at the same > > time). > > > > In case it isn't clear, I've been batching things up to try and ensure > > we only have to do this once for a variety of improvements :) > > I have to say that it's *extremely* unintuitive to have a minimum > version requirement on a version that hasn't even been tagged in the > git repository. If it's good enough to depend on, it should be good > enough to consider released. Agreed and I did add the tags. Cheers, Richard