From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] eglibc: fix installed but not packaged files
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:11:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310080299.20015.854.camel@rex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1srLZ2XZxss7h_FAy3nkuBY29qL+K_S4nd2a0Ra-mzmyjg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 14:41 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:25 -0700, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com wrote:
> >> -FILES_${PN} = "${libc_baselibs} ${libexecdir}/* ${@base_conditional('USE_LDCONFIG', '1', '${base_sbindir}/ldconfig ${sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf', '', d)}"
> >> +FILES_${PN} = "${libc_baselibs} ${libexecdir}/* ${sysconfdir}/rpc ${@base_conditional('USE_LDCONFIG', '1', '${base_sbindir}/ldconfig ${sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf', '', d)}"
> >
> > I don't think we want /etc/rpc in libc6, it's just a waste of space if
> > you aren't using sunrpc. Nobody has missed it thus far so I would be
> > inclined to delete it, but it could go in a package of its own if there
> > is a feeling that it's valuable.
>
> Moreover sun rpc is now obsolete in glibc 2.14 onwards so probably
> removing it from package is right thing to do.
We have a line deleting this but the libc-locale split seems to have
wiped out a few packaging fixes including the one that unbreaks it. I
have a local patch pending to fix the deletion of this...
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-07 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-07 20:25 [PATCH 0/7] upgrades & misc fixes nitin.a.kamble
2011-07-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] binutils: upgrade from 2.21 to 2.21.1 nitin.a.kamble
2011-07-07 21:39 ` Khem Raj
2011-07-07 23:12 ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-08 0:42 ` Khem Raj
2011-07-08 15:24 ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-08 8:00 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] gmp: upgrade from 5.0.1 to 5.0.2 nitin.a.kamble
2011-07-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] distro tracking: update devel.toolchain recipes's fields nitin.a.kamble
2011-07-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 4/7] binutils: package unpackaged files nitin.a.kamble
2011-07-07 21:32 ` Khem Raj
2011-07-08 15:26 ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-08 15:34 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-08 21:15 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-07-08 21:29 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-08 17:10 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-07-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] eglibc: fix installed but not packaged files nitin.a.kamble
2011-07-07 20:42 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-07 21:41 ` Khem Raj
2011-07-07 23:11 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2011-07-08 17:04 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-07-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 6/7] gcc-runtime: fix installed but unpackaged files nitin.a.kamble
2011-07-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 7/7] elfutils: fix compilations issue with the gcc 4.7 nitin.a.kamble
2011-07-08 15:23 ` [PATCH 0/7] upgrades & misc fixes Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310080299.20015.854.camel@rex \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox