From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 02/25] shlibpackaging.bbclass: create common class
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:17:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310548645.6337.218.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79c857d74346635be316e2bf42dc8d4224095da2.1310541680.git.sgw@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 00:33 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> +RDEPENDS_lib${PN} = "${PN}"
Why do we want lib${PN} to have a hard dependency on ${PN}? This seems
somewhat backwards to me.
Also, if ${PN} is the one with the binaries then it will get an
auto-generated dependency back to lib${PN} anyway and it looks like this
will cause a dependency loop.
Also also, if it really is correct for lib${PN} to RDEPEND on ${PN}
then, in the general case, it probably ought to be a precisely versioned
dependency to guarantee correctness. Individual recipes can relax that
if they want to.
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-13 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-13 7:33 [PATCH V2 00/25] Static Library Updated Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 01/25] bitbake.conf: Add *-config to default ${PN}-dev package Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 02/25] shlibpackaging.bbclass: create common class Saul Wold
2011-07-13 9:17 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 03/25] pciutils: repackage development files in pciutils instead of libpci Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 04/25] wireless-tools: Updated for staticdevpackaging Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 05/25] augeas: inherit shlibpackaging class Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 06/25] gamin: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 07/25] sqlite3: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 08/25] curl: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 9:14 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 09/25] attr: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 10/25] rpm: Create -staticdev package Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 11/25] libxft: use default bitbake.conf FILES Packaging to handle staticdev Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 12/25] js: Use bitbake default FILES for packaging Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 13/25] tcp-wrappers: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 14/25] udev: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 9:38 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 15/25] liba52: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 16/25] python: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 17/25] external-csl-toolchain: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 18/25] opkg: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 19/25] util-linux: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 20/25] gettext: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 21/25] gcc: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 11:43 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 22/25] glibc: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 23/25] eglibc: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 24/25] uclibc: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 7:33 ` [PATCH V2 25/25] binutils: " Saul Wold
2011-07-13 10:07 ` [PATCH V2 00/25] Static Library Updated Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310548645.6337.218.camel@phil-desktop \
--to=philb@gnu.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox