From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <philb@gnu.org>) id 1Qgxe2-0004Qu-P9
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:30:22 +0200
Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145])
	by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <philb@gnu.org>) id 1QgxaE-0004UN-Qw
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:26:26 +0200
From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:26:26 +0100
In-Reply-To: <6FD8E09E-1FDA-4CB6-84B0-085F878F0214@dominion.thruhere.net>
References: <1310547824.6337.212.camel@phil-desktop>
	<1310555312.20015.1096.camel@rex>
	<6FD8E09E-1FDA-4CB6-84B0-085F878F0214@dominion.thruhere.net>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- 
Message-ID: <1310556386.2378.6.camel@phil-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eglibc: ensure that NSS libs go into the right package when ${base_libdir} and ${libdir} are the same
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:30:22 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 13 jul 2011, om 13:08 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:03 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >> Previously, libnss_hesiod et al. could get swallowed by the wildcarded glob in ${PN}-dev.
> >> Fix it by moving eglibc-extra-nss earlier in the PACKAGES and adjusting its FILES to ensure
> >> that the devel symlinks don't get caught.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
> >> ---
> >> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc |    4 ++--
> >> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.13.bb     |    2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Merged to master, thanks.
> 
> That is missing a PR bump for eglibc 2.12

Oh yeah.  Do we really need to keep 2.12 around still?

I also wonder if glibc 2.10 could/should be deleted now.  That recipe
probably has a lot of the same issues that we've been fixing in eglibc
recently and it seems a bit of a waste of time to keep beating away at a
package that's four major versions out of date.

p.