Re: [PATCH] eglibc: ensure that NSS libs go into the right package when ${base_libdir} and ${libdir} are the same

[Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>]

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 15:16 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:14 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Op 13 jul 2011, om 13:26 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > >> Op 13 jul 2011, om 13:08 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> > >> 
> > >>> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:03 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > >>>> Previously, libnss_hesiod et al. could get swallowed by the wildcarded glob in ${PN}-dev.
> > >>>> Fix it by moving eglibc-extra-nss earlier in the PACKAGES and adjusting its FILES to ensure
> > >>>> that the devel symlinks don't get caught.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc |    4 ++--
> > >>>> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.13.bb     |    2 +-
> > >>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >>> 
> > >>> Merged to master, thanks.
> > >> 
> > >> That is missing a PR bump for eglibc 2.12
> > > 
> > > Oh yeah.  Do we really need to keep 2.12 around still?
> > 
> > It's the default for angstrom, dunno if that's a good enough reason :)
> 
> Does Angstrom have any plans to switch to 2.13?
> 
> Certainly we're not aware of issues with 2.13 and as such we should
> really consider phasing out 2.12 from OE-Core at least...

How about glibc 2.10; is anybody still using that at all?

p.